The AI Confidentiality Trap: Protecting Your Business from Breaches with ChatGPT & Other Tools
- amaramartins
- Nov 17
- 3 min read
Artificial intelligence tools like ChatGPT, Google Bard, and other large language models (LLMs) have transformed how we work, offering unprecedented efficiency. Yet, for all their power, they introduce a significant and often underestimated risk: business confidentiality breaches.
For UK businesses, especially those handling sensitive client data, intellectual property, or HR records, understanding and mitigating this risk is paramount.
How AI Tools Can Become a Confidentiality Leak
The core of the problem lies in how these AI models learn and operate. When you input information into a public AI tool, you might unknowingly be contributing your sensitive data to its training set.
Data Ingestion: Many free-to-use AI tools use user inputs to continuously learn and improve. This means your "private" question or prompt, containing confidential company details, client information, or even unreleased product specifications, could become part of the AI's vast knowledge base.
Inadvertent Exposure: Once absorbed, this data could, theoretically, be regurgitated by the AI in response to another user's query, exposing your secrets to the world.
Employee Misunderstanding: Many employees simply aren't aware of this risk. They might innocently paste proprietary code for debugging, summarise confidential meeting notes, or even ask for help drafting a sensitive email – all within a public AI interface.
A Real-World Wake-Up Call: Samsung's ChatGPT Debacle
This isn't a theoretical risk; it's already happened. One of the most prominent early examples involved Samsung. In 2023, it was widely reported that Samsung employees inadvertently leaked sensitive company information by using ChatGPT:
One engineer reportedly pasted confidential source code into ChatGPT to check for errors.
Another uploaded a confidential meeting recording, asking the AI to summarise it.
A third used the AI to optimise internal programming code.
Samsung quickly realised the severity of these breaches, fearing that their proprietary information could be learned by the AI and potentially exposed to competitors. As a result, Samsung implemented a ban on the use of generative AI tools across its devices and networks. This incident serves as a stark warning: even tech giants are vulnerable.
Protecting Your UK Business: A Compliance & People-First Approach
For UK businesses, avoiding a similar fate requires a dual strategy focusing on both policy and people:
Clear AI Usage Policy:
Define Permissible Use: Clearly outline what information can (and cannot) be entered into public AI tools.
Specify Approved Tools: If you allow AI use, specify which tools are approved and for what purpose. Consider enterprise-level, private AI solutions if feasible.
Data Protection & GDPR: Emphasise that entering personal data (even anonymised if it can be re-identified) into public AI tools is a potential GDPR breach.
IP Protection: Forbid the input of intellectual property, trade secrets, financial data, or client lists.
Comprehensive Employee Training:
Raise Awareness: Many employees don't understand how these tools learn. Educate them on the risks and the "terms of service" implications.
Practical Examples: Use real-world examples (like the Samsung case) to illustrate the danger.
Promote Internal Alternatives: Encourage the use of approved, secure internal tools for sensitive tasks.
Technical Safeguards:
Consider network-level blocks or monitoring for unapproved AI tools, especially for departments handling highly sensitive data.
Explore enterprise versions of AI tools that offer data privacy assurances.
The rapid evolution of AI means businesses must be equally swift in adapting their HR and compliance strategies. Treating public AI tools as a potential data leak is not an overreaction; it's a necessary step to protect your valuable information.
Comments